Pawsible Service Dogs — Social Services Charity in Auckland
Pawsible Service Dogs is a Charitable Trust charity in the Social Services sector, based in Auckland, Auckland. Annual revenue: $0.1M NZD. Financial data as at March 2026.
Mission: To connect people, dogs and communities. Enhancing the lives of individuals with service dogs, making anything pawsible, possible.
- Registration Number
- CC61678
- Charity Type
- Charitable Trust
- Registration Date
- 2023-10-09
- Status
- Active
- Sector
- Social Services
- Location
- Auckland, Auckland
- natalieramm@pawsibledogs.co.nz
- Data as at
- March 2026
Beneficiaries: People with disabilities
Financial Summary
- Total Revenue
- $0.1M NZD
- Total Expenses
- $0.1M NZD
- Reserve Months
- 0.0 months of operating expenses
- Staff Count
- 1
- Financial Year End
- 2026-03-31
Financial History
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Net Assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $0.1M | $0.1M | - |
| 2025 | $0.0M | $0.0M | $0.0M |
| 2024 | $0.0M | $0.0M | $0.0M |
Board Members and Officers
Current Officers (4)
| Name | Role | Appointed |
|---|---|---|
| Gail Harbott | Treasurer | 2025-03-28 |
| Natalie Ramm | Trustee & Canine Trainer | 2023-07-01 |
| Judith Davis | Trustee | 2023-07-01 |
| Priscilla Harbott | Trustee | 2023-07-01 |
Former Officers (2)
- Denise Russell — Trustee (departed 2025-03-28)
- Penelope Sinclair — Trustee (departed 2025-03-28)
Funding Sources
- Pub Charity Limited — $8,400
- Pelorus Trust — $3,000
- Four Winds Foundation Limited — $2,000
Similar Charities in Social Services
- Kotuku Trust — Social Services
- Rauawaawa Kaumatua Charitable Trust — Social Services
- Whakaatu Whanaunga Trust — Social Services
- Te Ora Hou Ōtautahi Incorporated — Social Services
- Te Rori A Mua Trust — Social Services
Pawsible Service Dogs
Financial data as at March 2026. Sourced from Charities Services register.
XRB Tier 3 lets smaller charities (total expenses of $5M or less; $2M for periods ending before 28 March 2024) file a simple-format performance report instead of full PBE standards. The return reports totals but not the program/administration split or the line-item detail our template needs. No red flags were detected in what was filed, and revenue is below our $2M rating threshold. (Whether the accounts must be audited is a separate Charities Act test: audit from $1.1M of operating expenditure, review from $550K.) A letter grade is withheld rather than assigning one that would be driven by the template-fit, not the charity's operations. The charity's filed figures are shown above, and any structural concerns a donor would want to look at are surfaced separately. (v3.3 — set at the pre-2024 Tier 3 ceiling; matches Charity Navigator and CharityWatch US practice.)
How ratings work →Reasons to look carefully (1)
These structural observations are drawn from public data and are worth considering before a donation. They are not allegations of wrongdoing, and they don’t affect the charity’s letter grade.
- No chair recorded on the registerNo chair or presiding role is recorded in the register for this board of 4. The Charities Register does not require one to be identified, so this is a gap in the public record rather than a finding about the board.
Each signal is a data-driven observation, not a judgement. They fire automatically from the figures filed with Charities Services. A charity can address any of these by filing fuller disclosure or updating its officer register. Methodology: /about/methodology/concern-signals.
$91.2K
$65.1K
1
Financial data from Charities Services annual return (FY2026). Ratings calculated using CharityData v3.1.1 methodology.
About
To connect people, dogs and communities. Enhancing the lives of individuals with service dogs, making anything pawsible, possible.
Who We Serve
Key Statistics
Financial Trends
Financial Trends (3 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Expense Breakdown
API DataBased on annual return data. Detailed program/admin breakdown not available.
Financial Health Dashboard
Based on latest annual return data. Metrics are calculated from reported financial data and may not reflect the full picture. View methodology
Revenue Diversification
HHI (Herfindahl–Hirschman Index) measures concentration across 6 income categories. Lower HHI = more diversified. Score above 60 indicates healthy diversification.
Peer Comparison
Ranked against 277 peers · Social Services · Under $100K
Top Peers in Group
Peers are charities in the same sector and revenue size band. Rankings are based on the latest available data.
Rating History
Is this your charity?
Claim your profile to view analytics, submit corrections, and improve your rating.
Claim This ProfileContact Details
Registration
Companies Office
Sector & Activities
Data sourced from Charities Services register and publicly available annual returns. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. Scores are calculated using disclosed methodology and are analytical tools, not investment ratings or recommendations. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@charitydata.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.
Similar Charities in Social Services
Other Social Services charities ranked by overall score